Community Page
- www.howardlindzon.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Speaking of freedom to steal... radio news headline this morning characterized Obama's weekly address as "pushing his nationalized healthcare plan." I think this was just regular...
- Jacko: "No matter what you say about Michael Jackson, there is little disputing the $500 million or so he left us in debt" "Us?" How do you figure "we" are on the hook...
- We need some trumpets; let's scare the hell out of them; 4th of July; no fear, today; buy a veteran a beer; happy 4th; if it were easy, we wouldn't need you; you are the best, and we...
- Sun Tzu isn't about fighting. It is about winning. You can learn more about applying the principles correctly in today's environment at Sonshi.com.
- Cool - please post it when it's ready.
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
Disclosure - Never traded a stock in my life :)
1 year ago
I don't mind paying into strength, but this is a bit out of hand. Most of these stocks are trading at least 2x standard deviations from the mean (50-day). That is overdone. I would hold what I have, but not buy at these levels. If they go higher, big deal. There is always something else to own.
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
I have no position in any of the upstream service or oil cos. Many of them are doing phenomenally well. Particularly the data driven service companies (Schlumberger, Halliburton, etc).
On the supply side... yes, there's an end in sight. It's WAY off on the horizon ( > 50 years). Plenty of runway there to find more or create viable alternatives. What Hubbard's Peak didn't adequately anticipate is the rate at which technology would improve and make marginal discoveries and tough recoverables into viable playable reserves. You have LOTS of deepwater discoveries coming online with companies going deeper and deeper finding bigger and bigger gas fields particularly.
Russia and China have yet to tap their own basins fully. Why should they? There are way too few refineries anyway right now. Frankly, there aren't enough geologists, physicists and engineers to get the job done. There's been a big brain drain in the industry since 1985's crash. On the educational front you'll see many of the students chasing the post-graduation $$. Geologist/geophysics/geo-engineers are going to be hot the next several years.
Don't be surprised if oil hits $200/bbl before seeing a correction.
While in San Antonio airport Monday a lady from California button-holed me once she found out I was in exploration sector and railed on me about being the boogeyman. "Why's oil so high!?" she asked.
Me, "Ma'am... are you paying $3.50+ per gallon?"
"Yes."
"Get San Francisco to boycott gasoline for a week. Not a day. A full week of hardship. And you'll see prices go down. Otherwise, the companies are getting what you're paying and have NO need to adjust downward. Classic supply and demand. You pay it. They charge it."
"Bullshit! Your one of Bush's cronies."
"If you don't like the price of bananas at the store what do you do?"
"Hello! I don't buy them."
"Right. What eventually happens?"
Silence. Golden silence.