<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Howard Lindzon  - Latest Comments in What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://howardlindzon.disqus.com/what_are_twit_twitter_and_fbook_facebook_worth/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:10:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15628969</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read that article too, it is really hard to decipher what the heck a tech company like this is worth. Truth be told, to a lot of companies out there marketing products Twitter is worth a lot of money to them. However, will spam take away all the good?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;via &lt;a href="http://twitterpublic.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitterpublic.com"&gt;http://twitterpublic.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William Bryant</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:10:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15626897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can't please everyone. I really think open can be taken way to far&lt;br&gt;  Too many startips and vc's want 100 million-500 million businesses. Thank god for me but stilll...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15626691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they did that it might discourage the vibrant 3rd party ecosystem that is building around their API.  I think it's actually to their advantage to continue to encourage rapid innovation around the platform by a multitude of 3rd parties, all of which feed the growth of the platform itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Hawkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15626659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:33:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15626657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thx&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:33:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15626506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They really should buy bitly tweetdeck and stocktwits already. I would be running it much differenetly but we all would&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15626057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;$TWIT is already taken. It's the symbol for the technology index in  Taiwan. Curiously, it is up about 50% YTD. &lt;br&gt;I can't wait for $FBOOK to become publicly traded. I expect it to reach a market cap of $15 to 25 billion within the first year of its IPO. &lt;br&gt;In its current model, $TWIT is still far from a 9 figure market cap company. If they find a way to incorporate all Twitter based applications into their business model, things will look different. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ivanhoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:13:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15624301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As I said here &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/iqugL" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/iqugL"&gt;http://bit.ly/iqugL&lt;/a&gt; in response to Scoble’s post, it's not that Twitter is the be-all-end-all tool. It's just that if it is used properly it can become the constantly in motion "front line" where your business (or your individual) interests can connect with other relevant people in the world who you are not yet connected to.  That’s a powerful value.  We have found then that it needs to be integrated with a deeper web presence (like what we’re attempting to do with &lt;a href="http://www.cloudprofile.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.cloudprofile.com"&gt;www.cloudprofile.com&lt;/a&gt;) that blends Twitter with other forms of content and engagement tools that can flow across the web for other forms of interaction (Facebook, e-commerce, etc.).  Twitter and open, publicly available micro-blogging is becoming and will remain an important part of the equation.  The value is still up in the air, but it's going to be big.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Hawkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:08:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15624040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If one strips out the stock market aspect of twitter (which can be quite valuable to stock lovers because stock guys love communicating with other stock guys), then one can argue from a better standpoint of how underhyped or overhyped twitter really is.  &lt;a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/04/09/is-twitter-overhyped-a-debate-please-join-it/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technologizer.com/2009/04/09/is-twitter-overhyped-a-debate-please-join-it/"&gt;http://technologizer.com/20...&lt;/a&gt;  I think the first guy makes some great points.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C. Beanie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:59:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15619416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can do better than that&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15619103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter and Facebook could be overhyped, due to the fact that we now have fantasy symbols for them. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C. Beanie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15611495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;phew...now i can realx&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15611354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:42:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15611281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i am definitely not tied to $ sign as i want to keep noise down.  i ike&lt;br&gt;exclamation point AFTER the symbol.... TWIT!    FBOOK!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15611276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey I remember that site...it was popular for a minute. I didn't even realize it was still around. I think they were bought by some financial company if i remember right. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chartreuse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15611136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's troublesome too... there should be a registry of symbols and some sort of verification to make sure the symbol corresponds to a trusted party. (sort of the way Twitter allows for trusted accounts)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in any case, let it be known that I hereby reserve %VRUZ for myself  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:33:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15611067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;definitely, they have huge crap to worry about.  &lt;br&gt;for some reason it still feels wrong to me to mix fantasy stocks with real ones.&lt;br&gt;how about a different syntax for fantasy stocks like %TWIT or something to that effect?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree there should be an index of private companies, and an all-private section to compare and graph private stocks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15610987</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am talking about a tag and a way to organize peoples links and opinions about hottest private web and alt energy biznesses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15610943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will take a look. Thx&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:24:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15610941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doubt it. Don't they have real crap to worry about. Seriously&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:24:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15610916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well 5 bil is ridiculous.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:23:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15609821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is 5B a firm offer?  I think not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dnarby</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15609755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;would the SEC have something to say about the Fantasy Stock Market mixing with the real one?&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15609529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;remember this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hsx.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.hsx.com/"&gt;http://www.hsx.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;was really popular for a while back in late 90s.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff DiStanlo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are $TWIT (Twitter) and $FBOOK (Facebook) Worth</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4205#comment-15596287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Comimg soon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>